“I fear that we have to be strict with the district of Antwerp, which concentrates 55% of new infections“, explains Professor Devroey.”No one will appreciate it, but we have to go back to a situation where people can only go out for food or to go to the doctor. […] The fire is burning.”
►►►Read also : Coronavirus: Marc Van Ranst advises against Antwerp, “a fantastic city to visit but not now”
The vice-dean of the faculty of medicine of the VUB refers to the incidence of the Antwerp district, which has climbed to 77 infections per week per 100,000 inhabitants. “In Germany, a district with more than 50 contaminations per 100,000 inhabitants is confined“, he notes. For him, there is no other decision possible.
►►►Read also : Coronavirus in Belgium: from July 16 to 22, the average number of infections was 255.3 per day
Dirk Devroey believes that the decision should even have already been taken. “The source of contamination is spreading. In the long term, the whole of Flanders or perhaps even all of Belgium risks being confined. The incidence in Flanders is currently 22 infections per week per 100,000 inhabitants. In Brussels and Wallonia, it is only 13 and 11 respectively. In absolute figures, the latest daily data are 421 cases in Flanders, including 285 in the district of Antwerp, 46 in Brussels and 43 in Wallonia. If we do not deliver this message, if the authorities do not intervene, we are heading towards a generalized containment scenario.”
The professor regrets that confinement is bad for the economy but “human lives are not valued in euros. For the image abroad but also among citizens, indecision costs more“.