"We left angry because I believe that the VAR has not helped us. At least on the second goal we should have reviewed the action better … The Atletico has done very well, because after the match with Sevilla he campaigned against the spectacular VAR and it has given them effect. It seems that now we have to do it to make it happen, but I think that should not be necessary and the VAR should work properly, "he said.
"I will be careful with my words, because then you know how everything works. It is normal for us to go out pissed off. Now that we have been reviewing images and seeing the repetitions, even more pissed off," he reviewed in the mixed area of the Metropolitan Wanda.
"I think that in Morata's first goal, the offside is very, very fair. There are even images that are circulating that you see that it is not out of play by centimeters. And in the draw that I mark, there is no lack no excuse is worth it. Anyone who is from football knows that this is not a fault, "he said.
"If it had been the other way around, it's a penalty? I don't think so. At the very least, take the time to go review the action, just like you did with mine with Felipe. I don't want to excuse myself in that either, because they have been better and they have won us, but this, and more in the situation we are in, hurts us, "he said.
And he insisted that he does not know what the referee has indicated in the action of his void goal. "According to him, it is missing. And the foul that I see is between the two Atletico players. All of us who have played football know that this is not a fault under any circumstances," he said. EFE