The Minister of Ecological Transition on Sunday called on EDF to "think" of its role in case a scenario "100% renewable energy" would be retained in the long term for the supply of energy in France, at the expense of new nuclear power plants.
"Have all the scenarios on the table"
"The goal is to reduce the share of nuclear power to 50% by 2035. Beyond, we must have all scenarios on the table with a goal to ensure for all French and businesses affordable electricity," said Elisabeth Borne in the Political Broadcast of France Inter, France Televisions and Le Monde.
In an internal document revealed Saturday by Le Monde, EDF estimates at least 7.5 billion euros the unit cost of possible new EPR, more than double the initial price of the third generation nuclear reactor.
Flamanville who has accumulated the setbacks and whose current bill reaches 12.4 billion.
Elisabeth Borne sends back the CEO of EDF
In October, EDF CEO Jean-Bernard Levy told the same newspaper that "it is clear that France is preparing to build new nuclear power plants". On Sunday, Elisabeth Borne said that "it's very good" that Jean-Bernard Levy "has his point of view, which I do not share. It turns out that the energy policy, it is rather the government and in particular the Minister in charge of Energy that I am who must define it ".
"I invite him to integrate this scenario on which the government works, 100% renewable. It is essential that EDF also think about how it can be a great player in such a scenario, "added the minister.
"I confirm that we are studying both a scenario in which we continue to make new nuclear power plants, and also a 100% renewable scenario," said Elisabeth Borne.
100% renewable scenarios, "not sufficiently studied"
"We must have all the elements on the table in mid-2021" and "we said we would not make a decision on new nuclear plants before the commissioning of Flamanville," she said.
Elisabeth Borne admitted that "what has not been studied enough is 100% renewable scenarios. We are not the only ones (countries) to study this kind of scenario. This is a scenario that we are studying with the International Energy Agency, and we wish to have the elements mid-2021 because they are not totally trivial subjects.
Nuclear energy "does not emit greenhouse gases, it's a plus" but "it produces waste, we have for hundreds of thousands of years, it's a minus", a- she summarized.